Hello.... So let's say that there is a world where a lot of people are colorblind in special ways. For example, one person can only truly see the blue in objects, another can only see yellow, and another can only see red. Now the first person would be able to admire the blue sky, the blue ocean, and everything else blue in the world... But they would not see the brilliant red of a strawberry or the calm greens of a forest; to a seeier of blue, such things would be insignificant compared to the sky and oceans. The person who could only see green would admire only the green objects and would never grasp why the seeier of blue would stare up at what seemed to be nothing more than a grey dome all day.
This is how their world worked... Different people had different values based on what their makeup was.
So, if you think about it, the nonblind person will have in common only a small fraction of their own opinion with others who are blind. The person who comes to love everything the world has to offer, coincidentally, will be person who is understood the least by others. That spells big problems for the one who can come to see the significance and value in everything when he is outnumbered by people who are only capable of limited view.
How can any of them possibly be empathetic to someone whom they can only partially understand? They could lie of course, but that doesn't fix anything in their world as a whole. The colorblind would still be blind and the lone person would wrongly believe they had helped educate the world. To speak the truth to the nonblind person would be more reputable, but it would also further alienate the person who is different from the rest.
Alienation. That is the burden the open-minded, nonblind person must bear. What will become of them? Will they endure their social displacement and attempt to educate and lead the blind or will they silently stay in the corner away from it all and mind their own business? Worse yet, there is always the option to be aloof and choose to acknowledge the validity of only one perspective.
As startling as it may seem, the nonblind person is not at all the hero in this story. The blind are the people with the task and obligation to improve the world. Why? Because one person cannot do it alone. The nonblind person is simply an impossible, unattainable model of what the blind should indefinitely strive to become. It is within the endless struggle for the blind to become unblind that the world will change. The only problem with the scenario is that the blind have to first choose to be unblind.
And that is what I define to be a tragedy filled mirror.








